Personal development for INTP people

So, I bought Steve Pavlina’s Personal Development for Smart People. Steve is a creative mathematical genius who has a passion for personal growth, and his book focuses on the principles behind any effective personal development program. So far, I’ve eaten up the first two chapters of the book, and I have to say that for someone looking for a framework behind all the disparate personal development ideas, I really like this book. It details 7 principles (really, three, but the next three are pairwise combinations of the first three, and the last is a combination of all three), as well as advice for strengthening one’s relationship to each principle. The principles are truth, love, power, oneness, authority, courage, and intelligence.

The think I like about this book is that it really gets to the root of personal development. It’s not about getting a better job, or meeting your perfect mate, or learning how to be better socially, although all of these positive benefits can follow from the advice in the book. The book’s about why we are here – our connections, our passions, the very things that drive us. When we strengthen our relationship to those basic seven principles we determine our own lives. To someone who has developed as an INTP, this is a great find.

The polio vaccine: friend or foe?

Before I launch into this entry, let me add the following disclaimer:

You and you alone are responsible for your health. This entry, and any other medical advice you read or get (even from doctors) with an honest, open-minded skepticism. Get the facts, and evaluate the evidence. Even doctors, and Ph.D. biostatisticians, make mistakes.

This entry continues a review of the book Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? by Neil Miller (2002 edition). I’ve already covered the tone of this book, and you might be able to guess it by its mere existence. It claims that vaccines, in general, are not safe and effective. This is a huge claim, but what makes this book different from other things you might read (especially forum postings and blog entries) is that the book is well-referenced. You can go to the source, at least in theory.

First, Miller tackles the polio vaccine. This vaccine is pointed to as one of the major successes of vaccination programs, taking polio from epidemic status to nonexistent. We even have the apocryphal story of Jonas Salk, leader of the research team that developed the first, inactivated virus vaccine, which was reported said to his celebrating team after their first victory with the vaccine in a trial: “We have to do this again.”

More below the fold.

Continue reading

Vaccines, the preface

This part of the review of Vaccines: Are they really safe & effective? (Neil Miller) will be short, as it is about the preface.

I have to admire a person willing to go the distance to research an issue as important as vaccination. This man looked up newspapers, congressional testimony, and the scientific literature for answers. He basically concludes that vaccines are not safe or effective, and, contrary to popular opinion, have not been responsible for the decline of infectious disease in this country. I’ll have to see about that one as I get further into the book.

He goes a step beyond this claim, however. He claims that professors, drug developers, medical professionals, professional societies, and regulatory agencies (US and international) are part of some scheme to hide the facts from the public. This is a serious charge to make against a lot of people, and, I must admit, I find this charge a little hard to swallow. Miller continues the line of thought with medical professionals that turn down vaccines for their own children and doctors who require indemnification before vaccinations. But let’s take this conspiracy theory with a grain of salt and set it aside for a while.

Miller claims then that he is presenting facts so that parents won’t “religiously trust their pediatricians.” He’s presented a difficult-to-justify opinion so far, so let’s see what his facts can do.

Technorati Tags:

Vaccines – wading into the debate (a skeptical book review)

So far, with only a couple of exceptions, my children have had their vaccines on schedule. I have refused the chickenpox vaccine for my older child and will refuse it for my younger child. I also refused the 6-hour HepB vaccine for my second child, but he has received the others on schedule (and the HepB at 2 months, which is apparently becoming a standard policy in my area).

However, there’s been the nagging question in the back of my mind about whether this is the right decision. I understand the basic arguments on both sides: we need to contribute to “herd immunity” and keep some nasty diseases at bay. On the other side, we talk about side effects of childhood vaccines (including autism, but that will be a rather minor issue in this series) and whether we need vaccinations at all. Even if we do need vaccinations, some have questioned the vaccination schedule, preferring a less aggressive approach that will still accomplish keeping the worst childhood diseases at bay. Still others wonder if we only need a subset of the current childhood vaccines we receive now, and let the body take care of the other ones.

So, now I kick off a new blog entry series reviewing the book Vaccines: Are They Really Safe & Effective? Neil Z. Miller looks to be a medical journalist who compiled this information because he was faced with the issues of vaccinating his children. The book is about 100 pages of text and figures, with 916 references (including newspaper articles, congressional testimony, and scientific articles). Miller makes the following disclaimer:

The decision regarding whether or not to vaccinate is a personal one. The author is not a health practitioner nor legal advisor, and makes no claims in this regard. Nor does the author recommend for or against vaccines. All the information in this book is taken from other sources and documented in the Notes. If you have questions, doubts, or concerns regarding any of the information in this book, go to the original source. Then research this topic even further so that you may make a wise and informed choice.

I can certainly second that.

I realize that the topic of vaccinations is a very touchy one. The most active blog entries I’ve had to date was on the subject of thimerosal, and arguments coming from both pro- and anti-vaccine proponents are filled with emotion and, often, venom. This is understandable, as the stakes are very high. If anything, this issue can use illumination of facts, and I hope that my review of a well-referenced book on the matter can do that.

So, as I go through this series, my primary goal is to provoke thought. I don’t care about comments; in fact, depending on how much value is added (or taken away) to the discussion I might disable them. We’ll have to see, as I don’t want this blog to resemble some of the forum pages I’ve seen on the matter.

So, on an overview of the book, and my reason for reviewing it publically, is that it is very well-referenced. Well-referenced does not mean true, but it does mean that I can go to the sources and evaluate them for myself. I probably won’t do that with all 916 references, as I do have other things on my plate, but I can probably hit some of the main points and try to find counterpoints as well.

The overall tone of the book seems to challenge the notion that vaccines are necessary and safe. (As the series progresses, I hope to see if the challenge stands.) A skim through the book reveals data, quotes, and events that presumably back up this challenge.

The Power of Now

It took me a while to get to ??The Power of Now??, but I finally read it on the recommendation of Michael McAlister at “Infinite Smile”:http://www.infinitesmile.org.

The book is very accessible, if a little repetitive. The repetition didn’t bother me that much because, as with most spiritual disciplines, it’s hard to understand the first time around. I appreciated Tolle’s nondenominational and inclusive approach to the deep mysteries of the great spiritual traditions and the way he touched upon such subjects as sexuality, drugs, health, and even karma (though he doesn’t mention that by name).

This book is definitely worth a second read, as I suspect that this is one of those books that has something new on each pass.

I can understand that there is possibly a large group of people that won’t get anything from this book. I think that’s ok. Spirituality is a deeply personal endeavor. Get the book and read it. If it appeals to you, keep it and read it again. If not, give it to a friend.

On yoga and the Anatomy of Hatha Yoga

I don’t write as much about yoga as I used to because, well, I haven’t though of that much to say. But given that I’ve been going on about alternative medicine recently, I should note that a simple “PubMed search”:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=pubmed&term=yoga reveals that yoga is being intensely studied as a complementary or alternative therapy to a lot of conditions:

* weight loss
* heart disease and risk factors
* pain management
* anxiety and stress
* psychological and physiological side-effects of cancer and the treatment of cancer

More often than not, yoga looks pretty good. Now, granted, it is nigh impossible to blind these studies. And for many of these studies, it’s hard to decide whether stepping on a treadmill and watching _Days of our Lives_ for a half hour each day would achieve a similar effect.

One thing is clear, though. Something is going on, and it’s caught the attention of researchers as well as a growing number of practitioners. I think much of the story can be told by the fact that yoga is an exercise that involves body awareness, mindfulness, and stimulation of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems (assuming you are doing savasana or meditation at the end — you _are_, aren’t you?)

At any rate, if you are a yoga teacher or serious yoga student, let me recommend ??Anatomy of Hatha Yoga?? by H. David Coulter. (Link to “Amazon”:http://www.amazon.com page below.) It is very dense an laden with physiology, especially stuff that you think you might have once been taught in your biology class, but you are not sure. I certainly don’t remember all of it. However, it has information that is hard to find anywhere else on just exactly what happens inside your body when you are doing hatha yoga, or heck just about anything else for that matter. It breaks down processes such as reflexes, pain, and breathing, and explains how the muscles, connective tissue, and bones interact to support the body. It even explains what happens when someone’s arm “gives out” in an armwrestling match. But most important, it analyzes the different types of postures (back bends, forward bends, twists, standing postures, abdominal exercises, and a couple of inversions) and explains relaxation and meditation. Even given what little I’ve absorbed from the book, I’ve found it helpful to know what is going on inside my body so that I can select which postures to focus on and know what to avoid in my home practice.

Tantra: The Path of Ecstasy by Georg Feuerstein

This book isn’t recommended for everyone, but only those who may be interested in the philosophical aspects of Tantra (_e.g._ as found in some Shaivism philosophies, or, more popularly, Tibetan Buddhism). A lot of the book is rather dry and didactic, but provides excellent information that would otherwise be hard to find.

Note that Tantra is not a collection of sexual positions or other practices, though many schools of Tantra have rituals that involve sexual union. The primary idea that _nirvana_ and _samsara_ are one and the same, and, in fact, these two concepts are to be transcended. The sexual union then epitomizes the union of consciousness and manifestation, or idea and action, or the abstract and concrete, or the end of whatever false dualism you might be struggling with. And, incorrectly taken, these practices damage rather than guide one toward enlightenment.

If you’re a devoted student of Hatha Yoga, or if you’re interested in the subject, it’s well worth a read. Otherwise, skip it.