Posted on January 21, 2007 by randomjohn
I’ve updated my Resource on Alternative Medicine. I’ve mostly added material on pseudoskepticism and why it’s a pretty bad thing. It still has a long way to go before being the definitive resource I want it to be, but hey, any improvement helps. Technorati Tags: pseudoskepticism, alternative medicine
Filed under: Alternative medicine, Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary | Leave a Comment »
Posted on January 13, 2007 by randomjohn
Well, we’re all sick, so what better to do than peruse the slums of the skeptical internet and point out all the bad arguments pseudoskeptics make in the name of “debunking” pseudoscience. I had taken this up as a hobby a little over a year ago, but, because it’s really too painful to read some [...]
Filed under: Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary, Skepticism, Who watches the quackwatchers? | 5 Comments »
Posted on November 26, 2006 by randomjohn
It’s been a while since I’ve tangled with the skeptics, and for good reason. I’ve pretty much stopped reading anything at “science”blogs.com or anyone that advertises the skeptics circle. However, I did come across “this article”:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoskepticism on pseudoskepticism, and pretty much points out everything that bothers me about these blogs I’ve kicked from my periodic [...]
Filed under: Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary | Leave a Comment »
Posted on July 23, 2006 by randomjohn
Bizarre, just bizarre. My canard rating dropped like a stone with just two entries! I didn’t even try. Perhaps I should stop using such terms as “placebo” and “quackery.”
Filed under: Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary, Who watches the quackwatchers? | 1 Comment »
Posted on July 21, 2006 by randomjohn
I don’t know if I can add anything to this. I think I might go for 10 canards. I wonder what I would have to do… I mean seriously, if a personal blog that espouses critical thinking of a different sort from Robert Carroll and the skeptics circle can get 8 canards out of 10, [...]
Filed under: Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary, Who watches the quackwatchers? | 1 Comment »
Posted on July 21, 2006 by randomjohn
By engaging in that bit of quackery known as “sugar detox,” I have lost 7.5 pounds in the last two weeks. That’s right. By drinking my coffee black (and cutting back to one cup a day) and eliminating sweets from my diet I’ve gone from around 210 to 202.5 in two short weeks. The only [...]
Filed under: Health and wellness, Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary | 1 Comment »
Posted on May 26, 2006 by randomjohn
Shorter Orac: Gah! Alties want mercury in their own products but no one else’s!
Filed under: Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary, Who watches the quackwatchers? | 2 Comments »
Posted on May 3, 2006 by randomjohn
Mike Adams (the “Health Ranger”) recently posted a “bit of vitriol”:http://www.newstarget.com/019364.html about skeptics of alternative medicine. An over-the-top article has provoked some “over-the-top”:http://www.autismstreet.org/weblog/?p=39 “responses”:http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2006/05/scam_skeptics_and_chickens.php#commentsArea. While Adam’s invective may have gone way too far in painting skeptics of alternative medicine as cowardly defenders of a failing system, I think a simple straw-man argument dismissal is short-sighted [...]
Filed under: Alternative medicine, Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary | 8 Comments »
Posted on March 4, 2006 by randomjohn
“Kevin Champagne”:http://autismreality.blogspot.com/ rediscovers a “comparison”:http://autismreality.blogspot.com/2006/02/conventional-versus-maverick-science.html of conventional vs. “maverick” science. Check the “maverick” science and skeptical/pseudoskeptical sectors of the blogosphere to watch these play out.
Filed under: Science and progress, Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 22, 2006 by randomjohn
For all the advances we have in chemistry, physics, and quantum mechanics, we still don’t know “why ice is slippery”:http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/21/science/21ice.html?ex=1298178000&en=5dc1e24f6f921e16&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss. Technorati Tags: ice
Filed under: Skeptic's skeptic's dictionary | Leave a Comment »